Monday, December 26, 2005

I do not get this at all . Cleansing history

I am unable to put the book Intelectual Morons by Flynn down. I do not recommed this book for anyone not named Mr Beamish. I have read two chapters at random and every hair on my body is raised.

The first chapter I read was the chapter on Margret Sanger. I have read the charges that she sought to reduce the number of blacks before. What I have never heard was that black leadership viewed he efforts favorably. Nor have I ever been told about mandatory sterilization, her speach before the KKK, her blatant anti Catholicism or her desire for Eugenics. Sorry 167, Sanger like you was a Socialist ( you are really a Commie). What type of idiot decides who shall breed ? The same nut jobs who send people to Gulags and take your property in their name.

The chapter on Kinsey was disgusting and he should have been executed for his behavior. Any person that encourages the practice of pedophelia should be put to death. It seems that Kinsey encouraged and took reports from predators who prey on children. There is mixed information but a high probability Kinsey and his staff perpetrated pedophelia himself.

The sections of his flawed research were generaly known. Kinsey wanted a certain result so he skewed his samples. This does not prevent the elite academic snobs from quoting research they know is flawed. The often cited one out of ten males is homosexual is and always was a lie from day one. Flynn cites two other studies that put the number around 2%.

The fact that some still cite this number today in shrill demands for power is startling. Gay rights should have been argued as human rights . Gay rights could also have best achieved by a libertarian type of mind your business approach. Even the most religious people acknowledge the primacy of Civil law in the USA. The image that the Gay community has presented is a needless self righteous and often shrill attack on those Americans who are religious. The whole tragedy is that the conflict between religion and Civil rights was avoidable. Sadly those on the far left are aiming at society rather then achieving results that they screech about.

The message of this book is that to the far left the message is more important then the facts. In the case of Sanger and Kinsey historians have done an almost Soviet style cleansing of the actions and writings of these people. The fact that Margret Sanger advocated Eugenics is far more important then Jeffersons relationship with Sally Hemmings.

Flynn's book should carry a warning label

12 comments:

Mr. Beamish the Instablepundit said...

What? You're not curious to find out how Kinsey discovered that 5 year old boys can "achieve orgasms" from "anal stimulation?"

Execution would have been too kind for that deranged faggot.

beakerkin said...

Kinsey was a disturbed evil man who claimed to be interested in science. The experimentation that Mr Beamish describes is 100% accurate.

How anyone can make a film and cleanse the evil perpetrated by this man is beyond me . Pedophelia is not a joke and that should have sent KInsey and crew to the gallows. Normal men and women (including gays) protect children from all types of predators. I was revolted by that entire section.

Mr. Beamish the Instablepundit said...

Kinsey's "studies" sexually assaulted children, both male and female, ranging from infants to age 14.

beakerkin said...

I read that in Flynn's book and was revolted. I knew about fraudulent statistics but harming kids in the name of science is sick. No doubt the left will cry about a war on science . However child molestation is not science. Perversion under the guise of research is still perversion. Why the government let this go on is a mystery.

Mr. Beamish the Instablepundit said...

I may have to get this book. Seems like Flynn has collated much of what I know of the left's sick and twisted road through history into one place.

Always On Watch said...

Beak,
How do you find these books?

The fact that Margret Sanger advocated Eugenics is far more important then Jeffersons relationship with Sally Hemmings. But these lesser known facts about Sanger don't fit the Leftist agenda, whereas Jefferson's alleged affair does fit the pre-determined agenda.

BTW, Jefferson's brother or cousin--I forget which--was quite a rounder. I believe that fact gets glossed over. I'm not a science person, but I think the DNA results can be interpreted in more than one way. Don't get me wrong. I'm not defending TJ, and I don't recall all the details the studies of the Hemings family. But centuries have passed. Furthermore, I can't get all bent out of shape about sexual doings so many years ago--too much like National Enquirer for me.

The information about Kinsey is nauseating.

Do you recall some years ago that a psychologist or psychiatrist at Harvard advocated that a girl's first sexual intercourse should be with her father, a year after the daughter reaches sexual maturity? Gag! The information about Kinsey reminds me of that Harvard "expert."

Pedophiles are like chicken-killing dogs and don't quit. They are sub-humans. As a teacher, I have, more than once, seen the sad results of pedophilia. One twelve-year-old in my class was impregnated by her older brother, after he was supposedly cured; he had previously sexually assaulted his five-year-old brother. God! The girl's life was ruined. The abortion she underwent was psychologically devastating, but carrying the pregnancy to term would also have been devastating. Her brother went for more treatment, but I don't know any more about this case. The entire family moved far away, and the parents eventually divorced. This was a very upper-class family, so pedophilia and incest are not confined to the hills of West Virginia.

Always On Watch said...

Beak,
I just placed a reserve on this book at my local public library. I may have to take Pepcid before I start reading it.

Always On Watch said...

Some weeks back, a commenter left this link at my site, and here's a snippet of info from it...

From http://www.homa.org/Details.asp?contentID=2137352826&TOCID=2083225445 :

Islamic Teachings on sex with infants:

"A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However, he should not penetrate. If he penetrates and the child is harmed then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl, however would not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl's sister."

The complete Persian text of this saying can be found in "Ayatollah Khomeini in Tahrirolvasyleh, Fourth Edition, Darol Elm, Qom"

beakerkin said...

Harming children is just revolting
and this is an outrage.

The author has a section on Ayn Rand that I have not read . I doubt this will come anywhere near the stomach turning in the chapters on Sanger and Kinsey.

Always I have not led a tame life but reading Flynn's book left me feeling the need to shower. Flynn was on a local talk show in NYC before I left. The book is a real eye opener and not recomended without a warning. Readers of this book may be outraged and nauseous.

The author delves into the private lives of the subjects. In Kinsey and Sangers case it may be wholy appropriate.

Mr. Ducky said...

How old are you, Beak? Just found out about Sanger and Kinsey?

Interesting that you think Kinsey should be killed. Well, that's about what I'd expect for a dim witted Nazi.

Thanks for informing us about something intelligent, informed people are well aware of. Keep going Beak and you be qualified to talk to someone other than a football fan or a Randroid libertarian.

beakerkin said...

Ducky

I am 100% in favor of executing serial pedophiles. If Flynn and the other version is true then Kinsey should have been executed. Pedophelia is not funny but you can go around hailing their rights.

Mr. Beamish the Instablepundit said...

If I'm reading Ducky correctly above, he's praising you for finding out the truth about his progressive heroes Sanger the genocidalist and Kinsey the baby raper, than condemning you for telling others.

Keep on betraying the sick-ass leftists, Beak!